Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Table of Contents
minLevel1
maxLevel7

Game Plan: Quality or speed?

...

Sprint Architecture

Backlog Item Breakdown

50% - 70% = Work for new features

30% = Other tech or sprint-related work including:

  • Ad-hoc testing

  • FR translation testing

  • Tech debt

  • Documentation

  • Release activities

  • Missed unit tests

  • Automated testing

  • Critical bug fixes

Required Backlog Items

  • Ad-hoc testing

  • FR translation testing

Daily Breakdown

Length: 10 business days

How to include: tech debt

Sprint Composition

Notes:

...

Day

Task

Team Members

Day One

Day Two

Day Three

Day Four

Day Five

Day Six

Day Seven

Day Eight

Day Nine

Day Ten

Release Plan

Checklist

Category

Task

Team Members

Testing

Feature, and features surrounding it, are fully tested

Sprint Composition

  • Every sprint: to release - need to make sure feature we release is fully tested, as well as features surrounding it:

    • Dev 1: Completes dev, bugs are fixed

    • Dev 2: write test case, automated testing, manual testing

    • New feature work 50%-70%; 30% might include tech debt, ad hoc testing, documentation, translation testing, release activities, missing unit tests and automated tests, critical bug fix

    • Might have a sprint where it is just bug fixes - might add all bug fixes in a specific sprint

    • Can we still use Ewa 4 days of the sprint - ad-hoc testing would really help - this would be very valuable. She could do ad hoc testing, writing test cases, etc. anything that is valuable. Even if she does a timeboxed one day ad hoc testing, that would be valuable - one day timebox on QA and one day timebox in ACC.

    • Need to communicate to the user that the cost might not be worth it to do non-valuable things.

    • Can use playwright for automated testing - have we solved the issue of authentication?

    • Change management - could write the ticket every sprint

  • If we follow this method, might not have to do a full regression test. But might want to do a 5 day regression.

  • Need - conversation about who will decide what is a bug or not or UI change we are not going to make. Action item: feature we will never fix - e.g. Here is a bug that is not a bug. Team can search to see what decisions were made.

...

  • B Unit testing - more like unit testing for the UI - not full UI automated testing

Regression Testing

Release Plan

Release Plan - brainstorming

...

Testing - brainstorming only

Discussion with Grace - April 4

Bugs addressed during the sprint. Leave some space for bug testing during the sprint

...

  • How to track modifications to backlog items. E.g. when testing, if something needs to be added, what should we do?

Discussion with Ashiq

PO and users:

  • test in ACC

  • They can test on the first day of the next sprint - will will give them a list of what we completed and they can test if they can, if not, that is ok - maybe 1 hr of testing for them

  • Dev - send a screenshot of new UI before the functionality is built to get feedback from PO via email. Do not need to send screenshots for things such as bugs, and FR translations. Only things we need feeback on.

  • PO walkover - two days before the end of sprint - 15-30 min to take a quick look if screenshots are not enough - flexible. PO may not need it every week.

    • Can show him work still in progress

  • Users can test in test environment if they wish after sprint review. We can give them a few bullet points of what we worked on. Either at end of review or first day of sprint.

...

How would we work with dev’s only to write test cases?

Discussion with Ashiq

QA free from manual testing

...