...
Work item (summary) | Description (details and purpose) | Priority (Critical, Important, High) | Work type (Tech, non-tech) | PBI created (number) | Effort/ Complexity Size (L,M,S) | Are there dependencies outside TK | Key dependencies (teams or processes) | Planned completion date MM-DY-YR | Status details (latest progress or any notes) | Status (in progress, done) | Lead | Notes or open questions | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Set-up launch preparation plan in confluence |
| Critical | Both | N/A | S | - | - | 06-04-21 | Populating the plan with what is known already. |
| Sunny | Closed this item once we have a somewhat firm grasp of the remaining work documented on this page. | ||||||
2 | MVP rollout strategy and declare target go live date |
| Critical | Both | S | Determine the exact population that will be targetted targeted with MVP.
| |||||||||||||
3 | Business approval completed |
| Critical | Non-tech | M | What are the different approvals that are needed? | |||||||||||||
4 | Operational reporting needs |
| Critical | Both | M | Yes | Business and user team | Need to collect the requirements here for MVP in addition for post MVP. | |||||||||||
5 | Production release process for MVP |
| Critical | Both | S | ||||||||||||||
6 | Provision and deploy to pre-production environments | DEV, TEST, ACC regions in cloud | Critical | Tech | M | Yes | Cloud team? |
| |||||||||||
7 | Provision and deploy to production environments | Production region in cloud | Critical | Tech | M | Yes | Cloud team? | ||||||||||||
8 | Approvals to launch in production | Critical | Both | ? | Yes | ? | |||||||||||||
9 | User identify management |
| Critical | Tech | M | Yes | Business and users | Need the different user roles defined and whom to assign to what roles. | |||||||||||
10 | Ensure that all of the PBI’s and features for MVP launch are captured in Devops |
| Important | Tech | N/A | S | 06-28-21 | Started to clean up Devops to have one MVP launch Epic with related features and PBI’s documented. |
| Troy | Can close once we feel confident we have remaining PBI’s in the Epic for launch MVP. | ||||||||
11 | Shared learning from recent launches in MSS |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | S | Yes | MITRACK PO/PM | 06-18-21 | Received some information, compared notes against our draft plans and added anything new. |
| Sunny | |||||||
12 | Understand application behavior in non-happy path scenarios |
| Important | Tech | ? | S | Need to discuss this and we close it out once we have a PBI that is completed. | ||||||||||||
13 | Vessel registry high level process documentation |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | M | Yes | Registrar supervisors, Change management | 06-14-21 | First part of new process in draft continue to work on getting it completed. |
| Hugo | |||||||
14 | Release notes and history documentation |
| Important | Tech | N/A | S | - | - | 06-30-21 | Page has been drafted need to create a structure and start populating with the key features (tech and user facing) |
| Sunny | Is Confluence or sharepoint a better place for this material? | ||||||
15 | Revised registrar work instructions |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | Yes | Registrars and registrar supervisors | TBD | We need to define the scope of this work and who is best suited. This is different from training materials? | ||||||||||
16 | Training plan of registrars to use workload management |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | No? | Registrars and registrar supervisors | TBD | We need a plan to be created that answers:
| ||||||||||
17 | Creation of training artifacts |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | Yes | -Registrars -Registrar supervisors -Change mgmt | TBD | Should be answered by the training plan. | ||||||||||
18 | Execution of the training |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | Should be answered by the training plan. | |||||||||||||
19 | MVP monitoring plan |
| Important | Both | - | Yes | Registrar supervisors, BI team | Need a discussion about this from a business and IT systems perspective. | |||||||||||
20 | Operational reporting requirements for MVP |
| Important | Both | Who are the key stakeholders for the purpose of requirements gathering? | ||||||||||||||
21 | Build MVP operational reporting |
| Important | ? | Depending on the requirements and approach this could combination of tech and non-tech. | ||||||||||||||
22 | Production release process post-MVP |
| Important | Both | |||||||||||||||
23 | Issue management process |
| Important | Both | |||||||||||||||
24 | Runbook (MBM) | Important | Tech |
| |||||||||||||||
25 | UXR strategy | Important | Non-tech |
| |||||||||||||||
26 | Execution of UXR strategy | Important | Non-tech |
| |||||||||||||||
27 | Summary of UXR results and identification of user blocking issues | Important | Non-tech |
| |||||||||||||||
28 | Closure of UXR issues | Important | Priority of the work item depends on the types of issues. If the issues block the launch then this work is critical, otherwise it is important/high. | ||||||||||||||||
29 | Go no go decision | Important | Both | N/A | |||||||||||||||
30 | Communication strategy pre and post launch |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | ||||||||||||||
31 | User acceptance testing strategy |
| Important | Both | |||||||||||||||
32 | Execute post production testing plan | Important | Tech | ||||||||||||||||
33 | New system of record for to house the procedures from the G drive |
| High | Both? | - | Yes | Registrars and registrar supervisors | ||||||||||||
34 | Modifications to vessel registry forms (pending changes) |
| Non-critical | Non-tech |
...