Here is a list of activities that will prepare us for the launch of our first production release. This list includes both technical and non-technical activities and some of these activities will be repeated for future releases and some will not necessarily be required. Each work item is not of equal size.
Priority categories:
1=Critical
2=Important
3=High
4=Non-critical
Priorities defined:
Critical work items are considered must have before launch otherwise the launch will not happen.
Important work items will not block the launch, but not completing the item may compromise success of the launch, so they need to be completed before launch.
High items will not block the launch but they should be completed before launch or as fast followers as they will lead to success of the launch.
Non-critical items are nice to have before launch but they can be be done soon after launch as followers.
Work item (summary) | Description (details and purpose) | Priority (Critical, Important, High) | Work type (Tech, non-tech) | PBI created (number) | Effort/ Complexity Size (L,M,S) | Are there dependencies outside TK | Key dependencies (teams or processes) | Planned completion date MM-DY-YR | Status details (latest progress or any notes) | Status (in progress, done) | Lead | Notes or open questions | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Set-up launch preparation plan in confluence |
| Critical | Both | N/A | S | - | - | 06-04-21 | Populating the plan with what is known already. | IN PROGRESS | Sunny | Closed this item once we have a somewhat firm grasp of the remaining work documented on this page. |
2 | MVP rollout strategy and declare target go live date |
| Critical | Both | S | Determine the exact population that will be targeted with MVP.
| |||||||
3 | Business approval completed |
| Critical | Non-tech | M | What are the different approvals that are needed? | |||||||
4 | Operational reporting needs |
| Critical | Both | M | Yes | Business and user team | Need to collect the requirements here for MVP in addition for post MVP. | |||||
5 | Production release process for MVP |
| Critical | Both | S | ||||||||
6 | Provision and deploy to pre-production environments | DEV, TEST, ACC regions in cloud | Critical | Tech | M | Yes | Cloud team? | IN PROGRESS | |||||
7 | Provision and deploy to production environments | Production region in cloud | Critical | Tech | M | Yes | Cloud team? | ||||||
8 | Approvals to launch in production | Critical | Both | ? | Yes | ? | |||||||
9 | User identify management |
| Critical | Tech | M | Yes | Business and users | Need the different user roles defined and whom to assign to what roles. | |||||
10 | Ensure that all of the PBI’s and features for MVP launch are captured in Devops |
| Important | Tech | N/A | S | 06-28-21 | Started to clean up Devops to have one MVP launch Epic with related features and PBI’s documented. | IN PROGRESS | Troy | Can close once we feel confident we have remaining PBI’s in the Epic for launch MVP. | ||
11 | Shared learning from recent launches in MSS |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | S | Yes | MITRACK PO/PM | 06-18-21 | Received some information, compared notes against our draft plans and added anything new. | DONE | Sunny | |
12 | Understand application behavior in non-happy path scenarios |
| Important | Tech | ? | S | Need to discuss this and we close it out once we have a PBI that is completed. | ||||||
13 | Vessel registry high level process documentation |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | M | Yes | Registrar supervisors, Change management | 06-14-21 | First part of new process in draft continue to work on getting it completed. | IN PROGRESS | Hugo | |
14 | Release notes and history documentation |
| Important | Tech | N/A | S | - | - | 06-30-21 | Page has been drafted need to create a structure and start populating with the key features (tech and user facing) | IN PROGRESS | Sunny | Is Confluence or sharepoint a better place for this material? |
15 | Revised registrar work instructions |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | Yes | Registrars and registrar supervisors | TBD |
| We need to define the scope of this work and who is best suited. This is different from training materials? | |||
16 | Training plan of registrars to use workload management |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | No? | Registrars and registrar supervisors | TBD | We need a plan to be created that answers:
| ||||
17 | Creation of training artifacts |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | Yes | -Registrars -Registrar supervisors -Change mgmt | TBD | Should be answered by the training plan. | ||||
18 | Execution of the training |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | Should be answered by the training plan. | |||||||
19 | MVP monitoring plan |
| Important | Both | - | Yes | Registrar supervisors, BI team | Need a discussion about this from a business and IT systems perspective. | |||||
20 | Operational reporting requirements for MVP |
| Important | Both | Who are the key stakeholders for the purpose of requirements gathering? | ||||||||
21 | Build MVP operational reporting |
| Important | ? | Depending on the requirements and approach this could combination of tech and non-tech. | ||||||||
22 | Production release process post-MVP |
| Important | Both | |||||||||
23 | Issue management process |
| Important | Both | |||||||||
24 | Runbook (MBM) | Important | Tech | DONE | |||||||||
25 | UXR strategy | Important | Non-tech | DONE | |||||||||
26 | Execution of UXR strategy | Important | Non-tech | DONE | |||||||||
27 | Summary of UXR results and identification of user blocking issues | Important | Non-tech | IN PROGRESS | |||||||||
28 | Closure of UXR issues | Important | Priority of the work item depends on the types of issues. If the issues block the launch then this work is critical, otherwise it is important/high. | ||||||||||
29 | Go no go decision | Important | Both | N/A | |||||||||
30 | Communication strategy pre and post launch |
| Important | Non-tech | N/A | ||||||||
31 | User acceptance testing strategy |
| Important | Both | |||||||||
32 | Execute post production testing plan | Important | Tech | ||||||||||
33 | New system of record for to house the procedures from the G drive |
| High | Both? | - | Yes | Registrars and registrar supervisors | ||||||
34 | Modifications to vessel registry forms (pending changes) |
| Non-critical | Non-tech |