Page Comparison

...

Potential further discussions / steps

1. reviewing the Kanban board: are we able to make it more “user friendly” less clutteredreview and revise content of the intake form →example mandatory repro steps and acceptance criteria fields.

2. writing a good issue report / templates / educating the clients on how to write a good bug report, log issues.

   1. screenshots would be helpful

   review and revise content of the intake form →example mandatory repro steps and acceptance criteria fieldsThis is an example of one that was created for the RPAS team:
   /wiki/spaces/DDMP/pages/1690763265
   
   Ongoing discussions around best testing practices.
   (TDD = writing failing unit tests, then writing the code to make those tests pass).
   Whole team approach to quality: /wiki/spaces/DDMP/pages/2413101059

   1. Techniques how to best test fixes.

   2. Templates?

Possible topics for a later date.

1. guidelines for acceptance criteria / educating the clients on guidelines for acceptance criteria.

2. agreement on a definition of ready.“Definition of ready”: An example, from RPAS: Definition of Ready

3. agreement on a definition of done.“Definition of done”: /wiki/spaces/DDMP/pages/2404679736

4. the process for dealing with requests arising on short notice.

5. having the other CIVAV teams on the same page with respect to development process.